Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Score for Differentiating Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common gastrointestinal emergency. In the place where urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is unavailable, empirical pharmacological therapy with vasoactive drugs for variceal bleeding or proton pump inhibitors for nonvariceal bleeding is recommended. However, the values of using clinical data for predicting the types of UGIB are unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the values and efficacy of clinical and basic laboratory parameters in predicting the types of UGIB. Methods: All patients with UGIB underwent EGD within 72 hours. Clinical and basic laboratory parameters were collected prospectively. The associations between each factors and the final diagnosis of UGIB were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Model of a predicting score to predict the type of UGIB was developed. Results: Two hundreds and sixty-one patients with UGIB were enrolled into the study. Of these, 47 (18%) were variceal and 214 (82%) were nonvariceal bleeding. Univariate analysis identified 27 distinct parameters associated with the types of UGIB. A stepwise logistic regression analysis identified 3 variables as independent factors to predict types of UGIB; previous diagnosis of cirrhosis or presence of signs of chronic liver disease (OR 22.4, 95% CI 8.3-60.4), red or bloody vomitus (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.7-11.9), and red or bloody NG aspirate (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.3). Variceal bleeding predicting scoring model was developed as: Z = (3.1 × previously diagnosed cirrhosis or presence of signs of chronic liver disease) + (1.4 × red or bloody vomitus) + (1.2 × red or bloody NG aspirate) 4.1, while 1 and 0 are used for the presence and absence of each factor, respectively. The probability of variceal bleeding is calculated from 1/(1+e -Z) or by plotting to the exponential graph. The probabilities of variceal bleeding are >90%, >60%, <10% and <5% for the presence of 3, 2, 1 and 0 factors, respectively. Conclusion: Three clinical parameters and variceal bleeding predicting score are useful to predict the types of UGIB and may aid clinical judgment for the initial management of UGIB before endoscopy.
منابع مشابه
[Gastrointestinal bleeding]
OBJECTIVE: To present an analysis of the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding in children and emphasize: i) diagnostic methods; ii) the organized use of different therapeutic approaches in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; iii) the review of concepts, classifications and techniques used in endoscopy, which are important to the practice of clinical pediatrics. METHODS: Literary review of chapt...
متن کاملPredictors of variceal or nonvariceal source of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. An etiology predictive score established and validated in a tertiary referral center.
BACKGROUND & AIMS. For upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), guidelines recommend pharmacological treatment before endoscopy. Therefore, it is important to establish an early diagnosis of the variceal or non-variceal source of bleeding. This study aims to analyze the clinical and laboratory parameters which are predictors of the UGIB etiology, and to develop a score for predicting variceal or...
متن کاملBleeding and starving: fasting and delayed refeeding after upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
CONTEXT Early refeeding after nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is safe and reduces hospital stay/costs. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was obtaining objective data on refeeding after nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS From 1 year span records of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients that underwent urgent endoscopy: clinical features; rockall sco...
متن کاملPrognostic value of the Rockall score in patients with acute nonvariceal bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract.
UNLABELLED Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common problem in everyday clinical practice. While treating patients affected by UGIB, the estimation of the risk of complications is very important. The Rockall Score is one of the methods used in clinical practice that allows doing that. The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of the aforementioned scoring system w...
متن کاملIs the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
Background/Aims Various clinical scoring systems, including the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall risk score (RS), and AIMS65 score (AIMS65), have been validated to predict the clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared the performance of these three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with UGIB in Korea. Methods We ret...
متن کامل